Hi all
I agree with Alan re Taneyev. In addition, he was not a 20th century composer. And I have no problems with 'Brahmsian' influences anyway. Or Reinecke, Saint Saens, Raff et all influences on 20th century composers. I just wish those influences had lasted and triumphed, rather than those of the 2nd Viennese School, jazz, atonalism and other fads.
I note that the sharp and perceptive Nicolas Slonimsky tends to emphasise home grown aspects of Khrennikov's music: "his own works express forcefully the desirable qualties of Soviet music, a flowing melody suggesting the broad modalities of Russian folk songs, a vibrant and expressive lyricism, and effective instrumental formation". I have only his piano concertos to go on, Amphissa, and have not heard them for a while. But as I recall, despite Slonimsky's mild and kindly assessment, he was no Rachmaninov.
The same writer has this to say about Lev Knipper: "under the influence of western European trends he wrote music in a fairly advanced style of composition, but soon abandoned these experiments and devoted himself to the study of of folk music of different nationalities..." That sounds like code for 'he conformed' after somebody in authority had words with him.
regards
Peter