Author Topic: Thomas Dunhill Symphony  (Read 389 times)

Alan Howe

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3008
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Dunhill Symphony
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 19 January 2012, 07:47 »
Taken as an Elgar-inspired symphony written in the shadow of those of the great man himself - and not that long afterwards - it's still a grand piece. And it wasn't written as late as Boughton 3 - which I also love with a passion.

Perhaps it's just me...

Dundonnell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1928
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Dunhill Symphony
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 19 January 2012, 13:54 »
Will give the Boughton 2nd and 3rd another go too ;D

Jimfin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Dunhill Symphony
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 19 January 2012, 14:19 »
I adore the third Boughton, still having trouble getting into the second.

eschiss1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3389
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Dunhill Symphony
« Reply #18 on: Thursday 19 January 2012, 14:57 »
They have a thread or three to themselves but will insert that I love both of them, find the 2nd more - elusive in character (it did take me longer) but equally passionate - it's the 1st that I need to stay with in hopes that it will stay with me :)

Jimfin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Dunhill Symphony
« Reply #19 on: Thursday 19 January 2012, 14:58 »
Yes, I fear that I will never really love the first, sadly, since I am a direct descendent of its subject

Dundonnell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1928
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Dunhill Symphony
« Reply #20 on: Thursday 19 January 2012, 15:40 »
Agreed :)

Boughton's Third is indeed a rousing, romantic and passionate piece :)