Unsung Composers

The Music => Recordings & Broadcasts => Topic started by: Alan Howe on Friday 18 December 2015, 17:55

Title: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Friday 18 December 2015, 17:55
...forthcoming from Toccata;
https://d2duss065tgxcq.cloudfront.net/toccata/wp-content/uploads/20150825225852/TOCC_0282cover.jpg (https://d2duss065tgxcq.cloudfront.net/toccata/wp-content/uploads/20150825225852/TOCC_0282cover.jpg)
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Wednesday 23 March 2016, 16:54
Oh dear, from the audio samples of the violinist, this doesn't sound as attractive as it might (intonation problems and a rather thin tone). What do others think?
https://toccataclassics.com/product/joseph-ryelandt-chamber-music/ (https://toccataclassics.com/product/joseph-ryelandt-chamber-music/)
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Double-A on Friday 25 March 2016, 08:49
Thanks for pointing out this disk.  Lovely pieces!  And such long audio samples!  You can get a good idea of the movements.  Some are even complete.

I'd say the violinist does not have any more intonation problems than I had with the Franck sonata...

Moving along:  The "thin" tone is--or so I believe--deliberately chamber musical.  Fitting the unassuming nature of the music (which is a bit like the Franck minus the flamboyance).  Imagine this being played in your living room--seems an appropriate setting for this music.  He or she is using little vibrato and does not display any fear of being covered up by the piano (whose part is written with that danger in mind I'd guess).  What I do hear at times is noise sounding as if it came from the bow, a very soft shsh..., more than I usually hear in performance, even more than I hear playing myself.

Now this is a matter of taste.  Personally I like the full range of possible sound exploited for expression, full and thin, loud and soft, straight and with heavy vibrato.  The violin (and its larger siblings) has an advantage over almost all other instruments in this field and should not waste it.  Especially in chamber music.  In this case, given the character of the music you would end up with quite a bit of "thin" tone.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Friday 25 March 2016, 10:45
I'd simply say that the violinist, on this evidence, isn't really up to the job. I've no idea how many intonation problems you had with the Franck VS, but this is a commercial recording and it's not good enough. Sorry.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Friday 25 March 2016, 10:52
...this is the summary of the review at MusicWeb:

The recording is excellent, as, largely, is the playing, although at times the slightly thin tone of the violin, and occasional intonation issues, would, I feel, legislate against the award of full marks here. If you're a chamber-music aficionado looking to increase your collection of eminently listenable CDs, by a composer probably unknown to most of us, and who hails from Belgium, then this CD could be of some interest. (emphasis added)
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: eschiss1 on Friday 25 March 2016, 11:11
I hope they will do better by his piano quintet op.32 (parts@IMSLP).
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: matesic on Friday 25 March 2016, 12:04
Concerning the violinist, I can easily sympathize with both viewpoints. I think Double-A expresses it to a T - music as essentially modest as this doesn't demand the fat tone and grand style that one often gets by default from "better" players. This sense of intimacy seems to be an increasingly rare quality amongst chamber music players.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Mark Thomas on Friday 25 March 2016, 12:33
Well nobody is forced to buy this recording, so prospective buyers really should listen to the generous extracts on the Toccata site and decide whether they like what they hear. It's clearly a matter of taste. Personally I don't mind the violinist's tone and can live with the odd dodgy intonation episode. The music itself sounds very attractive and I've paid my money.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Friday 25 March 2016, 17:29
I just think it could have been done so much better. Not for me, I'm afraid.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Double-A on Saturday 26 March 2016, 07:10
My Franck reference was primarily a way of saying that I consider intonation problems secondary, as long as they are not systematic.  One ought also to consider that people who play with less vibrato and smaller (or more modest) tone take a bigger risk in this respect.  A big vibrato covers many sins.
There are also some places where the violinist seems on the brink of failing to deliver--the bow shakes for example for a second.  I like that;  it shows again that the player is trying to play the music, not just the notes.  But I understand that a different reaction is also possible.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Saturday 26 March 2016, 08:16
I'm afraid I think the evidence demonstrates inability rather than intent.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: matesic on Saturday 26 March 2016, 09:00
However, I believe that a full, even tone all too often betrays mental disengagement. On a recent BBC4 programme which compiled performances by violinists from the last half-century I frequently marvelled at their technique but just as frequently missed any sense of imaginative interpretation, in particular the kind of phrasing and inflections of intonation that a singer would naturally apply. One might argue that the very best players should achieve both aims, but I agree with Double-A that fallibility can actually be a positive thing, disclosing the player to be a human being rather than an automaton. But then I would say that, wouldn't I?
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Saturday 26 March 2016, 11:21
I'm sorry, I just don't agree. I think one has a right to expect better playing than is in evidence here - especially on a recording. Better tone and more precise intonation aren't much to ask for.

Anyway, we've probably done this aspect of the CD to death. So, how about the music? Anyone?
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Double-A on Saturday 26 March 2016, 13:03
We will have to agree to disagree.  Meanwhile I want to point out another positive about this recording:  Very good ensemble playing.

Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Alan Howe on Saturday 26 March 2016, 17:36
And the music?
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Mark Thomas on Saturday 26 March 2016, 20:58
We have visitors staying for the Easter weekend, so the music will have to wait until next week in this house at least.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: Double-A on Sunday 27 March 2016, 07:23
Quote from: Alan Howe on Saturday 26 March 2016, 17:36
And the music?

I thought I'd already (implicitly) praised the music.  I think the music is very good indeed though I admit I have just heard the samples on the web site.  They are unusually long and I think allow a preliminary but not unfounded judgement.

The music is not "romantic" I'd say in spite of the use of "old-fashioned" tonality and harmony, it is very much 20th century in its matter-of-fact attitude, its concision and its absence of grand gestures.  Nicely written as ensemble pieces.  Chamber music in the literal sense of the word:  Intimate music for small ensembles and small audiences in small rooms, maybe ideally music to play oneself rather than listen to.
Title: Re: Ryelandt Chamber music
Post by: eschiss1 on Tuesday 13 February 2018, 22:52
Listening to the sonatas on this disc now (streamed over NML- the violin sonata no.4 in E minor, from 1916 but apparently not published until 1976 (by CeBeDeM) which is why you won't find it @ IMSLP! ...though the cello sonata op.22 and the 2nd and 3rd violin sonatas seem to have been published "s.d." in the 1890s so should be digitizable without any issues in Canada and the US.  Several other works on the disc seem to be in Belgian Library manuscripts only. He's still © in the EU for the next almost-20 years tho'... ).

(KBR Belgium has 267 entries in their library for Ryelandt, not so surprisingly :) . If Toccata continues the series, that could include several sonatines for violin and piano too, and his viola sonata Op.73; also there seems to be a "Sextet voor piano en strijkers op Vlaamse volksliederen" and piano trios etc.)

I've been curious about Ryelandt for some time I suppose, and am glad to have a chance to listen to several major works of his from the 1910s.

So far, enjoyed the E minor sonata...