Unsung Composers

The Music => Recordings & Broadcasts => Topic started by: Mark Thomas on Tuesday 21 March 2023, 15:14

Title: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Mark Thomas on Tuesday 21 March 2023, 15:14
I've uploaded to our Downloads Board here (https://www.unsungcomposers.com/forum/index.php/topic,9085.0.html) a recording broadcast by Swiss radio a couple of days ago of a concert performance last year of Raff's First Violin Concerto. The soloist, Anatol Toth, was only 19 at the time, which maybe accounts for the very short break between the second and third movements - the work is intended to be played attacca.
Title: Re: Joachim Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Double-A on Tuesday 21 March 2023, 16:02
Thank you!
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Alan Howe on Tuesday 21 March 2023, 18:36
Indeed, thanks very much. Mark. How good it is to hear another fine performance of this lovely, repertoire-worthy concerto. It's also good to hear a full-throated, but tasteful vibrato from the young soloist. No teeth-on-edge HIP reticence here!
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Mark Thomas on Tuesday 21 March 2023, 22:22
Yea, a thoroughly romantic interpretation. I thought he did very well.
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: eschiss1 on Saturday 25 March 2023, 01:27
Whose orchestration was used?
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: John Boyer on Saturday 25 March 2023, 04:57
Quote from: eschiss1 on Saturday 25 March 2023, 01:27Whose orchestration was used?

It's Raff's original.
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Mark Thomas on Saturday 25 March 2023, 07:37
Once the the autograph was discovered at the Eastman School of Music and a modern edition published by Edition Nordstern, there really is no reason for anyone to use Wilhelmj's awful Wagnerian rewrite.
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Alan Howe on Saturday 25 March 2023, 08:58
Absolutely, Mark. Well said.
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: eschiss1 on Saturday 25 March 2023, 11:50
so long as they knew about it (presumably) and were willing to pay Nordstern the rental fees (dunno.)
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Mark Thomas on Saturday 25 March 2023, 13:29
Only the partitur exists in autograph, there are no manuscript parts, so they'll have to have used the Nordstern edition partitur and parts.
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: eschiss1 on Saturday 25 March 2023, 15:23
ah, ok. I was confused in part because I'd read that the Sterling recording was based on Wilhelmj's edition (perhaps they used his violin part from the 1892? reduction and made their own parts from the score...)
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: eschiss1 on Saturday 25 March 2023, 15:48
actually, someone unaware of the original (now Nordstern) edition and wanting to perform the "neue ausg." as it's described which is to say the Wilhelmj could borrow the performance materials from Fleisher.
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Mark Thomas on Saturday 25 March 2023, 16:30
That's true, unfortunately. Actually, though, it's the Sterling recording which uses Raff's original score, then newly available from Nordstern. It's the earlier Tudor recording which had to use Wilhelmj's rewrite, because at the time the whereabouts of Raff's autograph was unknown.
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: eschiss1 on Saturday 25 March 2023, 16:31
Ah! Apologies to Sterling, I completely misremembered...
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Mark Thomas on Saturday 25 March 2023, 17:22
Fret not, Eric!
Title: Re: Raff: Violin Concerto No.1
Post by: Alan Howe on Saturday 25 March 2023, 18:00
Easily done, Eric.